Beat the Press

Dean Baker's commentary on economic reporting

4/20/2006

How Big Is China?

This is not a grand existential question; I am referring to the size of its economy. According to most news reports, China’s GDP is approaching $2 trillion, rivaling Germany for the #3 ranking in the world, behind the United States and Japan. In fact, this figure grossly understates the size of China’s economy. It is already far larger than Japan’s economy and is likely to surpass the size of the U.S. economy in less than a decade.

The error is simple. The standard number reported for China’s GDP is based on a “currency conversion” measure of GDP. This method takes China’s GDP, calculated in its own currency, and then converts this number into dollars, using the official exchange rate. However, China’s currency is hugely under-valued, so this method provides a very poor measure of the value of goods and services produced in China each year.

The method preferred by economists for most comparative purposes is a “purchasing power parity” measure. This measure adds up GDP by using the same set of prices for all the goods and services in all countries. In other words, it applies the same price to a bushel of wheat or a haircut in China as to a bushel of wheat or a haircut in the United States.

According to the CIA’s World Factbook, China’s purchasing power parity GDP in 2005 was $8.2 trillion. This compares to a U.S. GDP of $12.5 trillion. Adding in Hong Kong’s GDP puts the size of China’s economy at $8.4 trillion in 2005, just over two-thirds the size of the U.S. economy.

China’s economy has been growing at the rate of 8-9 percent a year, and most projections assume that it will maintain this rate of growth for the near future. If China’s economy grows at the rate of 7 percent annually, its GDP will be approximately $16.5 trillion in 2015, almost the same as the projected $16.8 trillion GDP for the United States (both numbers in 2005 dollars). At 8 percent growth, China’s GDP will be $18.1 trillion in 2015, and at 9 percent growth it will be $19.9 trillion.

There is considerable inaccuracy in international comparisons of GDP, but the basic point is that China’s economy will be approximating the size of the U.S. economy in the near future, and under plausible growth assumptions, will soon be considerably larger. This has important implications for the position of the United States and China in the world. I will allow others to work through those implications, but we have to start by recognizing how big China actually is.

15 Comments:

  • At 7:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Thanks for writing about ppp. So why does a respected economist like Stephen Roach at Morgan Stanley fail to use ppp when comparing income differences between the US and China to make the point that globalization has been a failure thus far?

    By the way, to get an idea of the relative size between Japan and the US, consider that in 1995 both Japan and China could be represented by a 1 yen coin (a little smaller than a penny). But in just 10 years, China's economy has grown to twice that of Japan. So while Japan is still a 1 yen coin, China is now the size of a 500 yen coin (between a quarter and a silver dollar)

     
  • At 11:09 AM, Blogger Finnsense said…

    What exactly does PPP calculate? I understand the principle it's just that in my experience (obviously massively partial) it doesn't seem to work. I have lived in the UK and Finland, which have comparable GDP per capita (PPP) but it at least appears as though Finns have much more money mostly due to lower house prices.

    The appearance is that the costs of rent and mortgage are not suitably weighted in the PPP basket. Has anyone else ever noticed this?

     
  • At 11:34 AM, Blogger spiiderweb™ said…

    A couple things. I read today somewhere (forgot where) China is now #2. They've passed Japan.

    The second thing is I think its time we all learn Mandarin. The dominant world economy usually determines the "common" language used.

    English might only survive as the "common" language because of the internets, but I wouldn't bet the farm on that.

     
  • At 9:07 PM, Blogger Globalize This! said…

    And this is what it will look like when China surpasses the US, graphically speaking.

     
  • At 9:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    "The method preferred by economists for most comparative purposes is a “purchasing power parity” measure."

    Could you gave an example or two where a non ppp comparison is better?

     
  • At 1:20 AM, Blogger Hans Gruber said…

    Off topic. I just had to comment on how much I like what you've started here.

    I'm very glad I found it. Keep up the good work, especially on immigration (the economic illiteracy on the issue just drives me mad).

     
  • At 10:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The size of China's economy raises an important question: why haven't they been invited into the G8 yet?

     
  • At 10:50 PM, Anonymous Arthur Eckart said…

    China's GDP is overstated and it's still a Third World country. China has generally adopted a "Growth at any Cost" policy, which is an inefficient policy. Consequently, China is selling its goods too cheaply, because it doesn't take into account other costs, e.g. negative externalities. Most goods China produces are heavy goods, because it's basically moving from the Agricultural Revolution into the Industrial Revolution (and it's two economic revolutions behind the U.S.). So, high commodity prices, e.g. oil and steel, increase production costs more than "lighter" economies. China exports a large part of its output to maintain "acceptable" employment levels. China's gains from trade are much smaller than its major trading partners, and it will lose even more when its currency appreciates, return on foreign investment falls, and inflation rises in its major trading partner's countries. There are real economic forces that will prevent China from surpassing the U.S. any time soon, e.g. decreasing returns to scale and diminishing marginal productivity.

     
  • At 3:06 PM, Anonymous JQA3 said…

    Although I work primarily on India, there is the same problem of choice between a PPP or exchange rate GDP measurement of the size of the economy. I believe the first cut should be the standard exchange rate measure of GDP and GDP/P. Valuing non-traded, mostly rural goods and services at US prices, gives the higher PPP measures, but food, housing, haircuts, etc. in India and China are not comparable. Above all, these PPP GDPs do not translate into the economic capacity to create defense, investment, and public goods since they are locked into small scale (e.g. family) enterprises and the factor markets are not flexible enough to permit movements along a transformation curve.

    As to China's rapid growth, if you retrocast these high figures of GDP +8% or more/year you will find that China has negative GDP not too far back. Something is wrong as agreed by most scholars who look closely at the Chinese rates.

    On balance then, one is much better off using the exchange rate measures for discretionary market size and capacity to transform or mobilize resources across sectors for public purposes and private consumption.

     
  • At 3:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    one thing people seem to overlook, or question, is how much of China's economy is growing from exteral inflows of money, and not from internal growth like the US, and Europe have done over the past few hundred years. The question is, once exports in China slow to a normal gowth rate that reflects them being successfully integrated into the world economy, how much growth will be delivered internally, or self-supportive???

     
  • At 4:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

  • At 12:19 PM, Blogger davinder said…

    THat information is great!, but the problem is that now the United States Economy is suffering a terrible economy downfall period, it is showing that the GDP is going to be lower than the 2005 estimates. SO i am asking if you could post some lastest news correction in the blog, though this helped me see how worse are economy of US is! Thanks, but plz update

     
  • At 2:52 PM, Blogger gsg said…

  • At 9:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I can get twelve sky Gold cheaply,
    Yesterday i want to buy 12sky goldfor my brother.
    i hope him like it. i will buy twelvesky Gold for him
    as birthday present. i like the 12Sky Silver Coins very much.
    I usually buy 12 sky gold and keep it in my store.
    I can get FFXI Gil cheaply.
    Yesterday i bought FFXI goldfor my brother.
    i hope him like it. i will give Final Fantasy XI gold to him
    as birthday present. i like the cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold very much.
    I usually buy FFXI Gil and keep it in my store.

     
  • At 1:16 AM, Anonymous cheap silkroad gold said…

    Now do you worried about that in the game do not had enough shaiya gold to play the game, now you can not worried, my friend told me a website, in here you can buy a lot shaiya money and only spend a little money, do not hesitate, it was really, in here we had much cheap shaiya gold, we can sure that you will get the shaiya online gold, quick to come here to buy shaiya gold .


    Now do you worried about that in the game do not had enough silkroad gold to play the game, now you can not worried, my friend told me a website, in here you can buy a lot sro gold and only spend a little money, do not hesitate, it was really, in here we had much silkroad online gold, we can sure that you will get the silk road gold, quick to come here to buy cheap silkroad gold.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home